Wednesday, 28 April 2021

Bloody Murder (2004-2005)

 








“Now on ITV1 Granada, with scenes that may offended some viewers, it’s Bloody Murder”

A corpse being carried up from a basement, a drowning, a violent stabbing, a strangulation, a man pissing himself as he is hung.  Not the kind of images you’d expect to see in the opening titles of a factual, regional TV show, but then again Bloody Murder wasn’t your average factual, regional TV show.  Allow me to take you down a very dark rabbit hole.

Never heard of Bloody Murder? Don’t worry you’re undoubtedly in the majority there.  Seemingly never broadcast outside of the North West region, never repeated, and now more than a decade and a half old, it is a programme that has left only the faintest of footprint on the internet.  Chances are this is the most anyone has, or will ever, write about the programme.

Remember all those ‘True Crime’ magazines that people’s grandmothers tended to pass on to each other.  Y’know the type whose colourful covers full of scantily clad models and sensationalist ballyhoo in no way prepared younger, impressionable eyes for a parade of hack articles about true crime, headshots of serial killers and smudgy, poorly reproduced photos of murder scenes, all immortalised on the cheapest paper possible.  Bloody Murder is Television’s heir apparent to such mags.  Bloody Murder’s stock in trade was dramatised recreations of historic murder cases that took place in the North West of England.  For a low-budget local TV show its timeline was cast ambitiously wide, the oldest cases to receive the Bloody Murder treatment date back to the Victorian era, the most recent the 1980s.  It’s likely that Bloody Murder was commissioned as part of ITV’s commitment to ‘local interest’ programmes, but any veneer of respectability falls away fast.  There was a thick air of exploitation about Bloody Murder.  Going out in a slot just after the 10 o’clock news, this was post-pub entertainment for viewers looking for blood, guts, cheap laughs and morbid thrills- and Bloody Murder delivered on all counts.

Two series of Bloody Murder were made between 2004 and 2005.  Executive producer Eamonn O’Neal has sired countless local TV shows, including some T&A programming during the Granada Men and Motors era, as well as being a local TV and Radio personality in his own right.  I only caught the tail end of the first series of Blood Murder, so my memories of it have become rather fuzzy.  One episode dealt with the crimes of Buck Ruxton an Indian physician who murdered and dismembered his common law wife, then went on tour, disposing of her body parts throughout the North, in a failed attempt to cover his tracks.  The bathroom dismemberment remained the episode’s main focus, its blatantly phoney, yet lurid depiction being reminiscent of Herschell Gordon Lewis’ Blood Feast, complete with stage blood running down the walls and fake severed limbs being waved in the audience’s faces.  Another episode featured a botched robbery of a Northern cinema, which left one unfortunate employee with his brains splattered about the projection room.  Present in the cast of one episode was Maxton G Beesley, comedy impressionist and regular in Cliff Twemlow movies.  Although my encounters with the first series of Bloody Murder were brief, any programme that waved severed limbs in the audiences’ faces and kept Twemlow’s old gang in employment can’t be all bad.  So when Bloody Murder returned for a second run in 2005, I was ready and waiting with a new fangled DVD recorder to hand.

Host of both series, and a quintessential part of the Bloody Murder experience is actor Lee Boardman.  Resembling a young version of an older Hywel Bennett, and usually found sporting a ‘bulldog chewing on a wasp’ facial expression, Boardman was at the time burnt into the public’s imagination as psychotic drug dealer Jez Quigley in the long running soap opera Coronation Street.  Quigley had quickly propelled Boardman to the status of TV’s ‘the man you love to hate’, something Bloody Murder was keen to capitalise on.  The unspoken truth between Bloody Murder’s host and the audience is that Boardman is basically ‘doing’ Quigley again in his host role here, but presumably they couldn’t get the okay from Coronation Street bosses to revive the character.  Even so, the connection does give Bloody Murder the status of an ultra-violent, unofficial Coronation Street spin-off. 

By all accounts Boardman is one of the nicest guys in the biz, as such you are left feeling a little guilty about attributing some of the Bloody Murder host’s shtick to the actor himself, when he is clearly ‘in character’.  The persona of Boardman’s host is pitched somewhere between Tod Slaughter and a 1970s Working Men’s Club Comedian.  Boardman recalls Slaughter’s leering ghoul, warning sensitive audience members when they are about to see a murder or disembowelling, then gleefully revelling in the deed itself.  Boardman also pulls no punches when it comes to brutal, put down humour- murderers, murder victims, passing simpletons, the deaf, people with posh accents- no one escapes Boardman’s venom.  Boardman is like the type of club comedian who zones in on a particular audience member and decides to make the poor bastard the laughing stock of the whole room.  Throughout both series, Boardman does nothing to reign in his strong Northern accent, indicating that no one involved in the programme expected it to play outside of the region.  Bloody Murder was made with thick skinned, Northern sensibilities in mind. 

Boardman is Bloody Murder’s dark heart and soul, when he isn’t onscreen, he is busy narrating.  Actually acting in a Bloody Murder episode appears to have been a thankless task.  On the rare occasions that the characters have dialogue, its Boardman’s narrator that speaks it, with the actors’ delivery buried in the sound mix.  Effectively reducing the Bloody Murder casts to mannequins in a true crime exhibition.  Boardman is why you came back to Bloody Murder though, just to see how sick, twisted and inappropriate the ghost of Jez Quigley would get this week.  Every episode guarantees several ‘did he really just say that’ moments.  Woe be unto him foolish enough to try and defend Bloody Murder against charges of bad taste.




“He’s 73, deaf, and missing a slate.  She admits to 47, and talks too much and drinks too much” is Boardman’s no-nonsense assessment of Alfred and Louisa Merrifield, the subjects of the episode “Where there’s a will” (broadcast 8/8/05).  A pair of con-artists who drifted around Blackpool in the 1950s, if you were to compare the Merrifields to sitcom characters, she’d be a domineering, battleaxe in the Nora Batty vein, while the doddery, incontinent, Alfred would be Walter from Nearest and Dearest.  The Merrifields con was befriending the elderly, setting themselves up as home help, then robbing and exploiting them until they were eventually found out and moved on to a new mark.  Their latest, intended victim, Mrs Ricketts however turns out to be every bit Louisa Merrifield’s equal when it comes to being a conniving schemer.  While Louisa sets about her usual business of half heartedly cleaning the house, constantly stealing and helping herself to the shopping, Ricketts feigns illness, takes to her bed and treats the pair like dogsbodies, stringing them along with the promise that the Merrifields will be written into her will.

As with Pete Walker films, the real horror here isn’t so much the violence but the all too real, all too believable human cruelty that surrounds it.  Louisa Merrifield and Mrs Ricketts inexplicably bond over the mutual satisfaction they get from humiliating, mocking and verbally abusing poor simpleton Alfred, whilst working him to the bone.  Bloody Murder has an undeniable knack for evoking, despicable, noxious personalities like Louisa Merrifield and Mrs Ricketts, but has a habit of embodying rather than distancing itself from their meanness.  Boardman’s host joining in on Louisa and Ricketts’ sadistic fun, by adding to the insults that come Alfred’s way, which includes ‘bog brain’, ‘plonker’ and ‘you stupid old halfwit’.  Bloody Murder’s idea of light relief for this episode revolves around the fact that Alfred Merrifield had a strange hobby.  The man’s only pleasure in life, so it seems, was found in other people’s toilets.  Alfred is barely through the door of Mrs Ricketts, before he is ecstatically admiring her toilet, singing the praises of its flush and porcelain work.  In the episode’s intended big laugh, Alfred gets so carried away over Mrs Ricketts’ toilet that his hearing aid drops down the toilet forcing Alfred to retrieve it and place the now soggy hearing aid back into his ear.  Naturally, host Boardman swoops down on Alfred’s toilet fetish like a hawk “he spent allot of time with bogs did Alfie” explains Boardman “after years working in a bog making factory, and now hours everyday using one...or trying too”.




Louisa Merrifield is in her element, drinking Mrs Ricketts out of house and home, and smugly looking on as Ricketts tears into her husband, saving Merrifield from doing that job herself.  Ricketts though signs her own death warrant when during her verbal outburst at Alfred, she lets slip that the Merrifields can easily be written out of her will, and that the pair think that they “can get away with murder”.  Soon after Louisa sends the dutiful Alfred to Manchester, to both fix his hearing aid and to buy some rat poison. 

By Bloody Murder standards poisoning is a relatively tame and bloodless way for someone to meet their maker.  Never let it be said though that this series doesn’t live up to its title.  The programme has to be bloody and there has to be a murder, those are the series’ ground rules.  If the murder itself isn’t all that bloody, the show’s Plan B tends to be to show you a character’s autopsy instead.  Where there’s a Will’s big gross-out moment then belongs to Mrs Rickett’s autopsy, depicted in such an over the top manner that its effect is alternatively disgusting and laughable.

In what has to be the sloppiest autopsy ever performed in the North West, two masked pathologists hack away at Ricketts’ remains with large kitchen knives as blood runs down the walls behind them.  In cheapskate Bloody Murder fashion the scene looks like it was shot in the cubical of a public toilet.  “There aren’t any bits that missed the pathologist’s knife” gloats Boardman “you name it and they’ll have a good butchers at it”.  To prove his point, the scene just goes on and on, as the masked duo fondle chunks of flesh and slice them into tiny pieces.  It’s as if a Bloody Murder crew member was in the midst of preparing a meal and hit upon the idea that it could double as a gore scene in the programme itself...by the looks of it someone was having a steak stew that night.





As for Alfred, he is one of few Bloody Murder subjects to receive something of a happy ending.  While wife Louisa is found guilty of murder and hung, Alfred is judged too incompetent to have committed the crime and is set free.  Alfred even managed to wrangle part of Mrs Ricketts estate away from her daughters (actions which make you question whether the comic, imbecilic portrayal of him here is really accurate) and cashed in on his notoriety further by selling the rights to his image for £500 to Blackpool’s chamber of horrors waxwork exhibition.  Host Boardman can’t resist one last twist of the knife “I don’t know why they bothered making a model, for 500 smackers he’d have stood there himself for eight hours a day, except for an hour or two now and again when he was in the bog”.

In 1950s Manchester it could be difficult to get to the top, especially if you were simultaneously playing bottom.  Just ask Peter Reyn-Bardt, the gay about town in Bloody Murder episode ‘The Skull’ (broadcast 25/7/05).  A high flying BOAC public relations man Reyn-Bardt finds that his homosexuality and promiscuity is raising eyebrows amongst his bosses, and costs him a promotion. 

Reyn-Bardt is effectively told to go straight or get out.  Apparent salvation comes in the form of the fake accented but impressively long of name Malika De Frenandes De Gonzales Dolly Vara, a waitress at one of the gay bars that Reyn-Bardt frequents, who agrees to a sham marriage in return for cash handouts and BOAC travel perks.  Malika is soon helping herself to Reyn-Bardt’s salary, free foreign travel and champagne, the latter occasionally causing her to forget her mess of a put-on Spanish accent and curiously revert to an Irish one.  Malika also enjoys her horizontal pleasures, not that her closeted hubby could care less.  “He didn’t mind the fortnight in France with a fireman, nor a dirty weekend with a copper in Copenhagen” leeringly notes Boardman.  Reyn-Bardt himself is no slouch in that department.  Bloody Murder’s idea of depicting the 1950s gay lifestyle is to have an actor playing Reyn-Bardt’s boyfriend walk naked through the living room to pick up the morning post, while Reyn-Bardt sits and drinks tea.  Inanimate objects and camera placement carefully masks the actor’s genitalia and buttocks, in an unintentionally comic manner that recalls coy nudist movies. 

“Not many men manage looking happy and being married...even if they’re straight” quips Boardman.  Soon Malika’s drunken indiscretions, and demands for more and more money drive both Reyn-Bardt over the edge, and a kitchen knife into Malika’s body...over and over.  The gore for gore’s sake ethos of Bloody Murder dictates that her murder is shown several times throughout the programme, each time edited in a different way.  It’s as if the programme makers couldn’t bring themselves to throw away a single frame of their blood splattered actors.






After killing Malika, the task of disposing of her body leads Reyn-Bardt to grab the nearest axe.  The prospect of an onscreen dismembering allows Boardman’s host the opportunity to taunt his more sensitive audience members “that’s right...shut your eyes”.  There are moments in Bloody Murder episodes where characters behave so dumb that you suspect audiences would never buy into it, were this to be served up to them as a work of fiction.  Take the senior rambler who stumbles upon Reyn-Bardt’s attempt to dispose of Malika’s body.  After chopping her up, Reyn-Bardt then tries to burn her in his backyard.  Only to be spotted by the rambler whose appearance immediately sparks derision from Boardman “the oldest boy scout in the land”.  Caught unawares, still covered in Malika’s blood, and with her dismembered body burning away in front of him, Reyn-Bardt manages to concoct a tall-tale about how his German shepherd died and that he is merely “burning his old dog”.  Incredibly, the old timer buys the story and goes on his way.  Freaking out at nearly being caught red handed, Reyn-Bardt decides to head out to Lindow Moss to bury what Boardman sniggeringly refers to as “bits of barbequed spouse”.

Alas, Reyn-Bardt’s efforts fail to save his career, with Malika out of the picture Reyn-Bardt’s sexuality once again comes under scrutiny.  “BOAC don’t want abnormal people” complains his boss “better consider your future, Reyn-Bardt, and find some line of work where it’s normal to be abnormal”.

Whatever sympathy you have for Reyn-Bardt quickly evaporates once this Bloody Murder episode jumps to 1982.  Catching up with an aged and hardened Reyn-Bardt after he has just done a stretch in prison for gross indecency.  Reyn-Bardt sows the seed for his own destruction by bragging to the other sex offenders about murdering his wife.  The years in-between haven’t been kind to Reyn-Bardt, as Boardman tactlessly points out “he’d turned into a droopy old man, anything that could droop had drooped” (how the actor playing the older Reyn-Bardt must have loved that particular Boardman observation).  The early 1980s also finds Reyn-Bardt in a cocky mood, faced with the allegation of murder by detectives, Reyn-Bardt merely lays down the challenge “prove it”.  He might have gotten away with it, had it not been for that pesky Elvis impersonator.

Enter Dave ‘Elvis’ Duckworth, who supplements his career as an Elvis impersonator by digging up peat from Lindow Moss, and accidentally uncovers Malika’s skull in the process.  In a perfect world, you get the impression that the makers of Bloody Murder would have preferred to use well known music as a darkly humorous commentary on the onscreen action.  A local TV budget, of course, meant that this would never be, and instead the programme is forced to merely name check a few song lyrics instead.  Duckworth mumbles a few lines of his hero’s Heartbreak Hotel “well, I’m so lonely, I’ll be so lonely, i could die” which creepily anticipates him unearthing Malika’s skull.  The sight of which causes him to faint, Elvis has left the building.  Elsewhere, the investigating detective taunts Rein-Bardt with a few lines from The Beatles’ When I’m Sixty-Four “will you still need me, will you still feed me, when I’m...” before reuniting him with his wife’s skull, causing Rein-Bardt to confess all, and allowing the programme to give yet another flashback to her murder.

The trial scene in this episode must have proved an odd acting assignment for Lee Boardman.  An actor playing a QC gives a lengthily summing up of the case, but as per usual for Bloody Murder its Boardman’s voice who we hear delivering the dialogue, with Boardman putting on a fake well-to-do accent, breaking with his Northern hardman persona.  Boardman in his role as host then returns to the narration to complain about the QC “what is this boring voice going on about”.  Imagine having to pretend to be annoyed and irritated by your own voice.  There is one last twist in the tale however, when it is revealed that the skull that the Elvis impersonator unearthed turns out to belong to a woman from the fifth century.  “Malika was still out there somewhere...probably helping grow tomatoes with some peat in some old couples’ greenhouse” speculates Boardman with morbid relish.                

If there ever could be considered such a thing as a ‘fun’ episode of Bloody Murder its ‘Lambs to the Slaughter’ (broadcast 1/8/05).  Its anti-heroes’ mixture of terrible luck, stupidity and incompetence effortlessly provides comedy material for Boardman to gorge on.  “Laurel and Hardy take to crime...only this time the big one is the dimwit” is Boardman’s introduction to Gwynne Owen Evans and Peter Allen.  I’m not sure I remember a Laurel and Hardy film involving gay sex, murder, sheep rustling or that ended with Stan and Ollie being hung, but whoever wrote this episode of Bloody Murder seemed tickled pink by the Laurel and Hardy comparison, and has Boardman labour the point throughout the episode.  It is hard to deny though that Evans and Allen (not exactly as catchy as Laurel and Hardy, is it?) do find themselves in a fine mess.  None of Bloody Murder’s subjects are what you’d call criminal masterminds- no guest villains in an episode of Columbo are this bunch- but even in the underachieving Bloody Murder school, Evans and Allen are the class clowns.  Allen is big, married and none too bright “he might have had all his chairs at home, but he was a stool or two short” jokes Boardman.  Evans is single, fancies himself as the epitome of 1960s cool (right down to wearing sunglasses at night) and is considered a genius by Allen, on account of the fact that Evans told him so.  In reality Evans appears to have been a small time hustler with a hair-trigger temperament when it came to the touchy subject of his own sexuality.  Allen lays down his dunce credentials early on, by bringing his wife Mitch and their newborn child along on an obviously nefarious night time excursion, masterminded by Evans.  Allen considers this a fun filled, big day out for his family, despite Evans pointing out that it is the middle of the night and there is nothing to see.  While Allen and his family doze off in the car, Evans knocks on the door of one of his old tricks, smoking jacket wearing bachelor Jack.  Arriving with his hand out for £100, it soon becomes clear that Evans will have to begrudgingly throw some gay fella business Jack’s way.  “Shall I snog you out here or in the warm” moans Evans on Jack’s doorstep.  A shot of the two men ascending Jack’s staircase anticipates a night of passion “there’s more than three steps to heaven in this house” says Boardman, punning on an Eddie Cochran song from the time.

After services are rendered, Jack turns tightwad, brushing aside Evans’ demands for cash, and forcing Evans to swipe Jack’s watch instead.  Calling in the heavy mob, Evans lets Allen into the house for an impromptu robbery.  Jack lunges at Allen, only for the younger man to get the better of him.  Soon Jack is lying battered and blooded at the bottom of the stairs.  While Evans ransacks the house, Allen repeatedly knocks Jack unconscious.  After sending Allen back to his car, Evans turns murderous, stabbing Jack in an outburst of either homophobia or self-hatred, telling his victim “I’m not like you Jack, I’m normal”.

Out of the blue, Bloody Murder suddenly turns into a jaunty 1960s road movie as Evans and Allen hit the road with Allen’s wife Mitch and her baby (in reality the couple went on the run with their two newborn children, but presumably Bloody Murder’s budget would only stretch to the one bambino).  Generic Merseybeat style music –the type you tend to find in cheap documentaries about The Beatles that can’t afford actual Beatles music- plays on the soundtrack, as the foursome speed around the moorlands in their 1960s car.  The entire sequence resembles a malicious spoof of ITV’s then popular ‘Heartbeat’ series.  “Forget the heartbeat” Boardman tells us “this is the Merseybeat”, before we cut to Evans and Allen relieving themselves on the moors.  Bloody Murder quite literally pissing on Heartbeat territory. 

The laughs continue when soft hearted Mitch takes pity on a passing lamb, resulting in a slapstick sequence where she, Evans and her husband chase the galloping lamb around the moors, before it too joins them on their ill-fated road trip.  The sight of Mitch in the back of the car, child in one arm, lamb in the other, catches Bloody Murder in an uncharacteristically cute moment.  “Larry the Lamb got his big day out”

Good luck continues to be a stranger to Evans and Allen however, their trip ends at New Brighton Funfair, which was closed for the day, and soon both are staring at a police cell.  While Evans is as cool as a cucumber, Allen turns into a terrified, remorseful mess.  Boardman might have Allen down as the Oliver Hardy of the duo, but Allen’s whimpering admission about Jack “I never even said hello to him” is pure Stan Laurel.

“In 1964 the death penalty was almost dead” explains Boardman “if you murdered someone on a whim, you didn’t get hanged anymore.  If you throttled your wife, your husband or the bloke next door when you’d had one too many, you didn’t get hanged”.  Evans and Allen’s run of bad luck proved to be terminal though, and a date with history as the last two men to be hung in Britain beckoned.  Evans’ only concern it seems was being remembered as a proud Welshman and heterosexual, reverting to his Welsh accent for the trial, angrily denying he was gay, and even claiming to be the father of Mitch’s children, resulting in a punch up between him and Allen in the dock.  Evans goes to his death still claiming to be straight and to have fathered hundreds of children.  His proclamations of being God’s gift to women only being silenced by the hangman’s noose.  Frequently comedic as this episode of Bloody Murder is, there is an unexpectedly touching and profound moment during Allen’s last, between the glass, meeting with Mitch.  “He stole my life, he has, that bastard” he rants, only for Mitch to sadly reply “you gave it away, Pete, you gave it away”.  Allen responds by smashing his face against the glass, allowing Bloody Murder to get some more gore in front of the camera.  Boardman’s host shows a flicker of philosophical compassion, telling Mitch “don’t apologise, kid, you’ve got a life to live”.  There’s a happy ending for Larry the Lamb too.  Boardman informs us that Mitch called the RSPCA, and Larry was adopted by someone who knew how to care for lambs...awwwwww.



Over the years I’d gotten it into my head that the episodes of Bloody Murder which dealt with more recent crimes, tended to tone down the series’ trademark insensitivity, for fear of insulting the still living relatives of those involved.  Exactly how I came about this notion, I don’t know, since this re-watch isn’t throwing up a great deal of collaborating evidence. 

Each new episode of Bloody Murder brought with it the question ‘who has got Lee Boardman’s back up this week’?  The answer in the episode “The Lady in the Lake” (broadcast 11/7/05) is amateur underwater divers, a type that failed to live up to the mid-2000s idea of masculinity.  “Blokes who don’t think much of a game of pool, a few bevies and a vindaloo” remarks Boardman with contempt “if you’re thinking of knocking off one of your loved ones and dropping ‘em into a lake, think again, every lake and reservoir in England is full of these guys”.  When Boardman can be pulled away from picking a fight with amateur underwater divers, he tells the tale of Peter Hogg who murdered his wife Margaret in an apparent fit of jealousy in 1976.  After which Hogg disposed of her body in a lake, where it lay until 1984, when one of those disgraces to masculinity who prefer poking about in dark, deep water to bevies and vindaloos, uncovered her carefully concealed corpse.  Finding more favour with Boardman is the efforts of the killer “wrapped in plastic and weighed down with a concrete block...nice job”.

Bloody Murder often leaves you feeling sympathy, not necessarily for the real life people depicted, but for the long suffering local actors who are expected to grin and bear being the subject of Boardman’s verbal savagery.  The actress playing the ill-fated Margaret Hogg, takes the brunt of this week’s put downs.  The body discovered in the lake is initially thought to be of a twenty something French student, who recently disappeared in the area, but as Boardman ungallantly notes “this slightly soggy stiff looked a good bit older than that”.  Elsewhere Margaret, who was strangled by her husband after he discovered about an affair, is described as “a middle aged, overweight woman, who should have known better”.  A bit brutal and uncalled for, especially as the actress playing the role appears to be nether middle aged or overweight, but then again would you want to argue this point with the erstwhile Jez Quigley, given that he’d already gotten himself all worked up over amateur divers.

In fairness Boardman is no less cutting in his assessment of Peter Hogg himself with the expected, below the belt insults “a dreary, droning drip with a permanent droop”.  Boardman also revels in the smutty details of Margaret’s infidelity “by God he was up for it” remarks Boardman of Margaret’s lover “he was up and he stayed up”.

The discovery of a wedding ring on the corpse soon brings the police to Peter Hogg’s door (“it’s not the Avon Lady” chuckles Boardman).  Hogg himself however turns out to be a welcoming and helpful kind of killer, who seems relived to have been caught and is soon serving up cups of tea to the policemen while confessing to his crime “he even got the chocolate digestives out” points out Boardman.

Hogg freely recalls the whole story.  After losing control and strangling his wife, he packed up her corpse into his car, complete with rowing equipment and conveniently discovered a 28 pound slap of concrete along the way.  A meeting with the head master of his son’s boarding school provided Hogg with his alibi, after which he sped over to the Lake District to dispose of the body.  Hogg rationalises his actions by claiming that had he immediately confessed to the crime his sons would have grown up without either a father or a mother.  Hogg it seems was such a remorseful and gentile host that the two policemen take pity on his plight, as it seems do the judge and jury who only convict Hogg of manslaughter and sentence him to an eyebrow raisingly lenient 15 months in prison.  Bloody Murder isn’t such a soft touch, or as easily won over.

‘The Lady in the Lake’ begins as business as usual for Bloody Murder with the Hogg story presented as a tacky Punch and Judy Show for our sick amusement, with commentary to match “Peter Hogg was busy confessing to strangling his wife, well...she was a slag”.  Initially the episode uncritically plays along with Hoggs version of events, portraying him as a hard done by, awfully nice chap (albeit one with a limp dick) whose elaborate cover up of his crime was motivated solely by his two sons’ well-being.  Soon though Bloody Murder smells bullshit, turns on its subject matter and begins to pull apart his seemingly selfless motivation.  Who has rope, rowing equipment and enough plastic to wrap a body, so easily to hand ?, and how did Hogg happen to lay his hands on a 28 pound slap of concrete?  Boardman’s host drops his usual salivating ghoul act and adopts an angry, righteous private investigator persona.  One who is determined to poke holes in Hogg’s story, in of course, Boardman’s customarily, blunt, no-nonsense Northern fashion.  “I’ve seen some strange sights on the Motorway myself, a naked hitchhiker in November, hedgehogs legging it across all three carriageways, all three lanes of the M6 blocked by a herd of cows, but I have never ever once seen a 28 pound slab of concrete with a handy hole in one end stood waiting on the verge”.

Never a show that is shy or embarrassed about its working class credentials, Bloody Murder has real fire in its belly, over the idea that Hogg’s middle class respectability helped sway the judge and jury.  “He was a gent, a toff, toffs get let off” says Boardman with genuine anger and bitterness.  Bloody Murder tormenting its audience with the maxim of ‘there’s one law for them, one law for us’.

Bloody Murder then provides a second, speculative version of events.  One that depicts Hogg laying in wait for his wife, sporting a black polo neck right out of the Milk Tray Ads, and then doing away with her amidst eyeball rolling declarations of “perfect timing” and “bitch”.  Effectively the episode ends up calling out Hogg as a lying, cold blooded killer right there on television.  Say what you will about Bloody Murder, but the series had balls.  Unlike- as per the gospel according to Lee Boardman- amateur divers.                       

Cloth caps at the ready as Bloody Murder takes us back to Blackburn 1935, where “cotton ruled the working classes, six days a week”.  Usually Bloody Murder cast members can be counted on the one hand, but “The Murder of Helen Chester” (broadcast 18/7/05) must have caught the producers in a generous mood, as it is practically an ensemble piece by their standards.  Setting the scene with a series of character sketches of ordinary folk going about their Sunday business, the only day of leisure in a hard time, in a hard place.  There is a cloth cap wearing old man dozing off in his backyard, children down a back alley skipping rope, a saucy madam walking the streets clutching a bible, a front for her to meet her married lover.  An amateur cricketer storms home in a rage, throwing his bat into the back alley.  Amateur cricketers don’t seem to make Boardman see red as much as amateur divers, but mein host can’t resist a bit of sexual innuendo.  According to Boardman the cricketer had been given “an LBW” quickly clarifying “that’s a cricket thing by the way”.

This being Bloody Murder, you know that sedate mood isn’t going to last for long, and soon the nothing special Sunday atmosphere is broken by the disappearance of a child, Helen Chester, prompting the locals to form a search party.  Having a few extras mill about the countryside in period costumes might not seem like such a big deal, but by Bloody Murder standards it’s a lavish touch.  The community spirit skips James Mills.  Dismissing pleas to join the search, Mills returns home to find his wife Edith traumatised and the body of Helen Chester lying in a pool of blood in his basement.  An incriminating hammer, also covered in blood, nearby.  Fearing the wrath of a lynch mob “they wouldn’t even get a trial, they wouldn’t even get hanged, they’d be torn limb from limb”, the Mills take the dramatic, mind-boggling decision to dispose of Helen’s body...by axe...by saw...and by fireplace. 




Only Bloody Murder would consider centring an entire episode around the dismemberment of a three year old.  Just when you think you’ve got the measure of how low and shameless the series can go, Bloody Murder manages to limbo that little bit more under the taste barrier.  Boardman is at his most Tod Slaughter-esque here, goading and appalling an imaginary audience with all the gristly details “poor Helen, now just a lifeless body, one that wasn’t going to stay in one piece” and “Helen Chester would never be seen in one piece again...THUMP, THUMP, CHOP, CHOP!!!”  So jovial is Boardman here that he even manages to work an ‘as the actress said to the bishop’ joke into his narrator duties.

As tends to be the case with Bloody Murder’s subjects, the Mills provide a master class in how to lead the police straight to your door and get caught red handed.  Chopping up the body and burning the remains in the fireplace only gets the Mills so far “by Monday night, one of the arms and legs had gone” Boardman informs us “but the rest proved harder to dispose of...she hid the bits that didn’t burn under her clothes in her bedroom drawers”.  All the smoke arising from the Mills’ chimney arouses suspicions, but Mr Mills really gives the game away by leaving Helen’s severed head wrapped in newspaper down their own back alley.  An unwanted gift discovered and unwrapped by the Mills’ cricket obsessed neighbour.  Mills then seals his fate by telling the first policeman on the scene that he’d already spotted the package but didn’t report it since he “hadn’t twigged it was the kiddy’s body” even though it hadn’t yet been established that it was part of Helen’s body wrapped in that newspaper.

Period authenticity is one of Bloody Murder’s most wobbly, inconsistent qualities.  Sometimes the programme can be meticulous and on the ball, other times it can be as careless as Andy Milligan’s period piece horrors with way too modern looking door handles, light sockets and even smoke alarms getting into shot.  I’m under no illusion that Bloody Murder was anything other than the work of artless, journeymen who probably knocked out local TV programmes by the dozen, but a combination of a low-budget and period considerations do lend the programme an accidental, but distinct, visual style.  This episode in particular is awash with tightly composed shots and eccentric camera placement –including a shot of a policeman filmed from the ground upwards- that like the Milligan horrors before it were obviously dictated by a need to keep the sights of the modern world at bay. 

As for the Mills, they remained tight lipped as too their actions.  Did Helen have an accident, which the Mills attempted to cover up? Or had a mysterious intruder broken in to their basement and committed the crime?  Boardman isn’t buying it “not even two of Britain’s leading legal eagles could persuade even a jury of half-wits to fall for that”.  The Mills’ lawyers were embarrassingly forced into offering no evidence in their defence, but in an ironic twist the couple’s ‘say nothing’ stance, ultimately paid off.  While the trial resulted in the couple being sentenced to death, both dodged the hangman’s noose.  Mr Mills was even acquitted, after the judge at the first trial was found to be in error by not advising the jury that they had the option of convicting the couple of mutilating and concealing a body rather than murder.  Bloody Murder then repeats its trick from ‘The Lady in the Lake’ episode of offering up two, speculative version of events.  One in which Mrs Mills accidentally kills the girl, the highly deaf Mills depicted as nailing a picture to the wall, then striking the child with the hammer as she turns round.  Another pointing to a mixture of envy (“you’re getting older by the minute, Mrs Mills, lines everywhere, discoloured teeth” taunts Boardman) and annoyance at the child as the reason for turning the hammer on her.  The truth however has been lost to time, as such this is an ambiguous episode of Bloody Murder that frustrates you as a viewer, but intrigues you as an armchair detective.  What happens in Blackburn, stays in Blackburn.

Bloody Murder travels further back in time to 1889 for ‘Arsenic and Old Lawyers’ (broadcast 15/8/05).  The story of Florence Maybrick, the young American wife of wealthy cotton merchant James Maybrick.  We’re introduced to Florence buying fly paper at the local store, allegedly to disburse the flies gathering in her kitchen.  Her actions raise the eyebrows of the shop keeper, who is left to ponder why a lady such as Florence has ever ventured into the kitchen anyway.  An area that the wealthy left to the servants back in those days.  Unbeknownst to the Alabama born Florence, fly paper had picked up quite the reputation in late ninetieth century England as a tool for would be poisoners to extract its arsenic content from.  Boardman provides a ‘don’t try this at home’ type disclaimer, in his own inimitable way “girls if you’re thinking of popping out for some fly paper, don’t bother, they don’t have arsenic in them anymore” he advises “just glue and all you’ll do is stick his lips together”.  It turns out that Florence did want the fly paper for its arsenic content, but not for murder, rather her husband James had a raging addiction to the stuff, a then popular jones amongst the rich.  “Quite a few Victorian gents reckoned it did what Viagra does now” claims Boardman.  If so, it certainly seems to have had the desired effect for James Maybrick, who also had a mistress and a few illegitimate children to support.  On the other hand when the unhappy Florence too strays from the marital bed, and is spotted with her lover at Aintree, she receives a black eye from her abusive, and arsenic abusing hubby.  James Maybrick’s chronic addictions begin to take their toll on his health, leading to an acute dyspepsia diagnosis and for him to seek an embarrassing suppository cure.  Naturally this being Bloody Murder, the programme has a field day when it comes to the administration of Morpheus suppositories, with the actor playing Maybrick required to drop his trousers while the actor playing the doctor pretends to pop one in.  “Very popular with Victorian quacks were suppositories” notes our host, adding “they liked a bit of discomfort in those days”.  The Victorian quack disgustingly wipes his fingers on his suit, before complimenting himself on “a job well done”.  Florence voices contempt for the antics of her ailing husband’s doctor within earshot of maid Alice Yapp, who hates her.  Florence further blots her copybook with Yapp after foolishly sending Yapp to post a letter to her lover, telling of her husband’s ill-health and her despair at caring for him.  Naturally the trouble making Yapp opens the letter, passing it on to Maybrick’s brother, who also despises Florence.  Soon Florence is virtually a prisoner in her own home, having been placed under house arrest by Maybrick’s brother, who assumes control of the household.  Maybrick eventually expires in his bed and Florence ends up on trial for murder.  By Bloody Murder standards this isn’t too much of a violent comeuppance, so you guessed it...its AUTOPSY TIME!!!  as another blood splattered pathologist is shown hacking away at a corpse, much to Boardman’s gleeful approval “all his bit and bobs got a good looking at”.





As with ‘The Murder of Helen Chest’ episode, this is another Bloody Murder outing that is indecisive over its subject’s guilt or innocence.  What with James Maybrick’s twenty year addiction to arsenic, it really tough to say whether his demise was self-inflicted or whether Florence did away with him.  Even if she was slipping him some arsenic on the sly, his own voluntary intake of it, leaves a huge question mark over whether she or he should take the blame for his death.  Bloody Murder initially paints her as an icy, adulteress, femme fatale but appears to have doubts and second thoughts over that image as it progresses.  In all likelihood there is a very credible case for Florence Maybrick being a victim of the era’s puritanical, and possibly xenophobic, mentality.  Her biggest crime in the eyes of Victorian society seemingly being adultery.  Florence is hauled in front of a courtroom full of hissing spectators and an apparently senile judge, who as Boardman points out, later died in an asylum.  The Judge condemns Florence in his summing up by claiming “a woman capable of adultery, was probably capable of anything”.  Found guilty, and eventually serving fourteen years in prison, it is implied that her incarceration met with Royal approval with Queen Victoria quoted as demanding “that wicked adulteress should rot in prison”. 

Compassion isn’t something that comes easy to Bloody Murder either, particularly for a privileged woman from a different century.  By rights this episode should be passionate and incensed about society’s treatment of Florence, but there is an air of indifference about her here.  The episode instead getting its jollies by throwing guts around and getting belly laughs about suppositories.  That’s where this episode’s head is at.  Boardman’s riposte to the judge’s comment is straight out of the working men’s club joke book “a woman capable of adultery was probably capable of anything” scoffs Boardman “I’ve known married women who’d have the pants off any fella, and they still couldn’t change a plug”. 

Lest the audience’s bloodlust isn’t fully satisfied by that autopsy, this episode pulls some last minute gore from its sleeve, thanks to the footnote that in 1992 a diary, alleged written by James Maybrick, emerged that pointed to him being Jack the Ripper.  Inspiring this episode of Bloody Murder to sign off with a cheap recreation of a Jack the Ripper murder, with the Maybrick actor dressed up in traditional Ripper garb of a top hat and cape, as he is seen making a bloody mess of a Victorian prostitute down a dark alley...personally, i blame the suppositories. 




Had they thought to make public information films in the 1920s, of the variety that gave children the fear about talking to strangers, then they’d have probably looked like Bloody Murder episode “Murder on the Moors” (broadcast 4/7/05).  You certainly wouldn’t have wanted Albert Burrows as a babysitter, a slobbering, moustached, obese creep who had stone cold pervert written all over him.  Albert is seen with his trademark thick stick, embarking on a moorlands walk with Tommy Wood, the four year old son of one of his neighbours.  Young Tommy doesn’t come back down from the moors.

It’s likely that this episode was shot back to back with ‘The Murder of Helen Chester’, a grim double-bill if ever there was one.  They both contain lengthy search party sequences, seemingly sporting the same locations, possibly the same actors, and certainly the same vintage policeman’s outfits.  The latter presumably on loan from ‘Greater Manchester Police Museum’ who are thanked in the end credits of both episodes. 

Leading the search is Albert Burrows, in a transparent attempt to divert suspicions from himself.  Albert proves to be the most dedicated of the search party, continuing on well into the night, till he is the last man on the moors.  Detective John Ellis Shadwick smells a rat though, especially when he delves into Albert’s chequered past.  One that includes convictions for “stealing, larceny, assault, cruelty to a cat, bigamy”.  The assault convictions in particular catches Shadwick’s eye, since they involve “children...little children”.  This is visualised in a sequence that is equal parts P.I.F and British horror film, as Burrows loiters around a graveyard, menacingly approaching an unfortunate young boy, whose terrified face ends up filling the screen...leaving little doubt as to what kind of assault we’re talking about here.

Over the years I have given quite a bit of consideration as to why the majority of Bloody Murder was filmed in black and white, with only Boardman’s host segments being presented in colour.  It’s an unusual move for a series that was going out on a commercial TV channel in the mid-2000s.  Was it an attempt to match these recreations with the well worn black and white archive footage that the series occasionally falls back on to bring these bygone times to life (if so, it doesn’t work).  Or did ITV get cold feet over the amount of gore in the series and hoped that it going out in black and white would lessen the impact (if so, again it doesn’t work, and there is a moment in this episode that blows that theory to pieces).  Whatever the reason, it’s hard to deny that black and white often feels just right for Bloody Murder.  The tough, poverty stricken times evoked by the programme and the tales of misery that came out of it, would never be well served by colour.  The use of black and white in this particular episode turns out to be a blessing in disguise.  Leading eerie atmosphere to its landscape of church graveyards and desolate, foreboding moorlands.

Bloody Murder’s mission in life is to dispel the idea of the past being an oasis of crime free decency where people could leave their doors open and where nothing bad ever happened to anyone.  All sentimental, rose-tinted bullshit, according to Bloody Murder.  “A time of innocence, makes you wish you could go back in time” narrates Boardman over some of that aforementioned black and white archive footage (courtesy of the ‘North West Film Archive at Manchester Metropolitan University’) before ominously adding “....or does it?”.

Every episode of Bloody Murder walks a tight rope between a programme that can be entertaining and a programme that is too dark, too depressing to do anything but plunge you into the doldrums.  You take your chances with Bloody Murder.  Murder on the Moors is firmly in the latter camp, what with its themes of child killing and sexual abuse, it captures the series at its most sombre, with Boardman’s jokey shtick dialled down significantly.  In a calculated, tabloidish manner it’s an episode designed to work the audience into a blood boiling, fist clenching fury, constantly torturing them with all the horrendous details of Burrows’ crimes.  After little Tommy’s lifeless body is fished out of a mineshaft, its revealed “he’d been raped, brutally, and was probably alive when he was thrown down the shaft”.  The sight of Burrow’s face sporting a sly grin, prompts an insult of “the smug bastard” from Boardman.  After the discovery of Tommy’s body an impromptu lynch mob charges after Burrows, and nearly succeeded in hanging him from a tree.  A turn of events that gets the Boardman seal of approval “nothing like a good lynching...you’re gonna dangle and strangle”.  The police break up the party however, and detective Shadwick’s examination of Burrows’ bigamy charge reveals even deeper depths to Burrows’ depravity.  A further excavation of the mineshaft unearths the remains of Burrows’ mistress, her four year old daughter and “a few bits of a baby boy...Burrows’ own son”.  After working the audience up into a frenzy, Bloody Murder finally provides them with the cathartic charge of seeing the villain of the piece get his comeuppance.  Quite the comeuppance it turns out to be as well, with Burrows pathetically pleading his innocence as the noose goes around his neck.  When he is hung, there is a close-up of piss running down his feet, prompting Boardman to chip in “a little trip to the lav, before all this, might have been a good idea”.  So pleased were the makers of Bloody Murder with this shot that it takes pride of place in the series’ opening credits.  Although it’s only when you see this moment in its proper context, that it dawns on you just how obscene that shot is.



Don’t start to disperse yet though, the audiences’ cries for vengeance might have been satisfied, but they’re yet to get their expected bloodshed from the programme.  Bloody Murder manages to satisfy that demand, even if it does have to scramble around the back roads of the story to find it.  The fate of Burrows’ hangman, John ‘the Rochdale Executioner’ Ennis, leads Bloody Murder to this week’s gore quota.  After he walked away from his job, Ennis became tired of life, but proved less adept at executing himself as he had others.  Turning a gun on himself only resulted in him blowing a bit of his jaw off.  A few weeks later a cut throat razor succeeded in finishing the job. 






In a gimmicky horror movie fashion, Bloody Murder momentarily reverts from black and white to bring you the sight of Ennis slashing his throat in full colour, bright red blood splashing all over the camera lens.  Leaving Boardman to wonder “why would an expert hangman not hang himself?”  Bloody Murder provides a possible answer, with a reprise of Burrows’ pissing himself, this time with a child’s laughter creepily dubbed onto the soundtrack.

“The Sack Murder” (broadcast 23/8/05) takes us back to Liverpool 1913 and introduces us to George Sumner, a slimy employee at ‘Bradfield and Tenor Tarpaulins’ a manufacturing company that is doing a brisk trade in sacks.  “People used allot of sacks in 1913” explains Boardman “they had too, nobody had invented plastic, imagine that eh? A world without plastic bags”.  A dandy dresser with delusions of being a ladies’ man, anything in a skirt and who is above his own station is fair game for George.  The initial object of his universally unwanted attention, aloof and bossy Ms. Venables quickly makes it clear she wants nothing to do with him.  Later George fumes when he catches Ms. Venables having it away with a lowly fellow employee.  His ego ruptured, Sumner now channels his attentions onto Christina Bradfield, the posh daughter of the company’s founder, with disastrous consequences.  Playing the part of the long suffering, working class stud, Sumner tells co-worker Sammy Elltoft to hang around for him after work because “she’s been pestering me, she’ll be sick as chips if i don’t give her one”.  As if.  Unable to cope when his advances are spurred for a second time, Sumner explodes into a rage “frigging tease, all those looks”, beating Christina over the head with a hammer.  Boardman’s host role becomes both Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde here.  Boardman defends m’lady’s honour  “she’s a respectable professional woman, and if she did want a man that’s just what she’d want a man, not some jumped up, half witted twerp” but then narrates from Sumner’s point of view “whose Miss high and mighty now”, jumping inside of Sumner’s head, and what is going on in there sure isn’t pretty.  Undeterred by the bloody hole in his left in her forehead, Sumner hikes up Christina’s dress, having his way with her dying, if not already dead, body.  “If you want to know what necrophilia is” advices Boardman “look it up for yourself”.





Sumner hurries out to Sammy, trying to brush off the incident as rough sex gone wrong, claiming they were “having it away against a door, and fell over and she banged her head”.  Sammy isn’t buying it, but a flash of the cash Sumner has lifted from Christina’s purse convinces him to aid and abet Sumner anyway.  Taking advantage of being in a sack making factory (“just as well it wasn’t a tin-can factory” quips Boardman) the pair wrap her body in one of the sacks, disposing of it in a nearby canal.  Since concrete wasn’t around back then, the body is soon discovered and leads a trail right back to Sumner and Sammy.  “There was all sort of things you could find in canals in those days, not supermarket trolleys or kiddies bikes, just the odd body or two, it really was the good old days” jokes Boardman.

In an unexpected flash of intelligence Sammy concocts a version of events that incriminates Sumner but absolves himself, telling the police he “just thought it was rubbish” he was dumping in the canal.  Sumner on the other hand goes on the run, but despite Liverpool’s docklands offering the chance for overseas travel, can’t bring himself to go far.  “He was a genuine scouser” says Boardman “Warrington was a different country to him”.  Sumner instead turns master of disguise, and is soon sporting a ludicrous moustache (phoney moustaches are a bit of a Bloody Murder hallmark, but at least this one is meant to be funny).  Sumner’s distinct ape-like way of walking soon gives the game away, and a silly walk leads him to a date with the hangman.  All the while unapologetically boasting of his sexual conquest “I gave it to her real good”.  Murder, rape and necrophilia- Bloody Murder’s idea of going out with a bang rather than a whimper.

So, with ‘The Sack Murder’ Bloody Murder cockily swaggered off into the night, never again to darken television’s doorstep.  16 years on, it’s a safe bet that a series 3 of Bloody Murder isn’t forthcoming.  There has been nothing so appalling in the annals of North West television before or since.  Bloody Murder is the most tasteless, callous, insensitive, indefensible, blood splattered series ever to air on British TV, yet call it what you will, even the slightest exposure to Bloody Murder should tip you off that this is a mean son of a bitch of a programme, one that doesn’t give two fucks what anyone thinks of it.  By today’s standards its beyond the pale, a raw meat eating, red eyed, anti-social beast of a TV programme, no doubt locked away in a damp, dark basement of ITV, in a room covered with bloody handprints, kept hidden behind a door marked ‘Do Not Repeat’.

Deep down I know that I’m making the internet a worse place by contaminating it with Bloody Murder’s memory, but after 16 years lingering on in my subconscious I think it is time to give the series one last stab at infamy.  See, in all those 16 years, I’ve never met a single other person who has seen it, so resign myself to the fact that if I don’t write about Bloody Murder, then no one else will.  The great tragedy of Bloody Murder is that it is a programme born to cause outrage, offense and controversy, but in the event couldn’t get arrested.  A late night timeslot, the boring facade of a local interest programme and lack of exposure outside of the North West dooming it to a life of obscurity.  It was addictive though, you have to give Bloody Murder its dues there.  Like Murray Brown in Vampyres, you failed to heed good advice, and week after week returned back for another dark session, even though you knew that each time you did, you were being drained of a little bit more of your humanity.  This then was the price Bloody Murder demanded for seeing the cobbled streets of the North West run red with blood.     


                  

                   

Wednesday, 7 April 2021

At the Video Shop

 


My very last VHS player crapped out and died on me over Christmas. Don’t feel too bad about this though as, truth be told, I hadn’t used it properly in years, but this got me thinking about the VHS era, and my history with it, a story that now has a definite beginning, middle and end.  My family were relative late comers when it came to video, I don’t think we owned a VHS player till around 1986.  So the famous Video Nasty furore had largely been played out by the time my parents scrimped and saved enough for a VHS player.  The very first video rental shop we went to was “The North West Video Centre”.  Which all sounds very grand but in reality was just some guy who, in a moment of Thatcherite entrepreneurialism, had hollowed out his front room into a video shop, decking out the four walls of it in video shelves, with a dividing VHS stand down the centre of the shop, which initially separated the VHS releases from the Beta releases. Yes, Beta was still hanging in on there till as late as 1986, but it wasn’t long before the shop became a hundred per cent VHS.  Which, come to think about it, must have been a massive setback for these small, independent video shop owners, given that nearly half their stock suddenly became obsolete.  Somehow though, the North West Video Centre weathered the death of Beta, and for many years this tiny little shop seemed to have the monopoly on video rentals...I don’t recall any other video rental shop in the immediate area.  The closest that it seemed to have by way of competition was the local library, a Brutalist monstrosity called The Lancastrian Hall and Central Library, which half heartily branched out into renting videos, albeit only with a relatively safe and mainstream taste in movies...The Man with Two Brains, I-Man, Raiders of the Lost Ark and Disney’s Baby were amongst the titles that I for some reason remember.  Whether it was a knock on effect of the Video Nasties saga, I don’t know, but horror titles were thin on the ground at that place.  Their only horror title that sticks in my memory was The Beast Within, with its “please kill me” tag line.  Since I would have been about 8 or 9 at the time, there was of course no chance I was going to get to see movies like that for a long time.  

Alarmist newspaper pieces might have been awash with scare stories about irresponsible working class parents letting their kids watch Driller Killer or Cannibal Holocaust at home while they went down the pub, but in reality myself and everyone I knew had parents that kept a fairly vigilant and responsible eye on what their kids watched.  At that age, the only things down at the North West Video Centre that my parents allowed me to watch was a Captain America cartoon (I still have that “when Captain America throws his mighty shield” song imprinted on my brain) and Time Bandits.  A little admission, I’ve always hated Time Bandits, I don’t know if it is the film itself, or whether it just came to represent my own personal nemesis when it came to getting in the way of the really cool looking horror films I wanted to see at the North West Video Centre.  Inevitably, when you were in those places it was the titles that you couldn’t see that had the greater hold over your imagination.  Ones I vividly remember were Galaxy of Terror, The Monster Club, Time Walker, Ragewar and Zone Troopers.  These days I have managed to catch up with the majority of those, with the exception of Ragewar, and have to wonder if I had been able to see these films as a kid, whether they’d have had the same impact on me.  Don’t get me wrong, I would be prepared to fight in the corner of some of them, but none ever really lived up to my childhood expectations.  Especially Galaxy of Terror whose cover, if you remember, had this skeletal bird creature attacking a woman, and for years you try to imagine how that scene will look on screen, and of course when you eventually watch the film you discover that scene isn’t in the film.  That VHS cover presumably being born out of the Roger Corman theory of thinking up a title and poster before the film itself, and may have been my earliest life lesson in how B-Movies can play fast and loose with the truth.  

Looking back, my parents weren’t entirely spoilsports when it came to what I was watching.  Anything that showed up on late night television was deemed okay, so I got to see all the Hammer and Amicus movies at a relatively young age.  Curiously, I don’t recall seeing any Hammer or Amicus films on the VHS rental shelves, with the exception of The Satanic Rites of Dracula on Warner.  I know some of those films had pre-cert VHS releases, but by the late 1980s those appeared to have disappeared from the shelves.  I wonder if the fact that those films played so much on late night TV back then meant that there was a perception that they weren’t going to do much business at the video rental stores.



former site of The North West Video Centre 

I’m sure the people who were born after the VHS era, or who only saw the back end of it, have the idea that VHS store owners were these rogues who’d offer kids video nasties under the counter when their parents weren’t looking, but I’m afraid the ones I was around had an unfortunately moral streak to them, albeit with the occasional touch of twisted humour to go with it.  I remember I nearly came close to talking my parents into renting Return of the Living Dead for me, but then they decided to open up the question of whether I was old enough to watch the film to the owner of the North West Video Centre, who with a mischievous grin then went into the most lurid description of Return of the Living Dead I’ve ever heard.  It was along the lines of “well...do you think he is old enough to see a film where half a dog is squirming about on the floor, or where brains are eaten, oh and a head is sawed off...” and then he began describing scenes that weren’t actually in the film “is he old enough to see maggots tearing through human flesh”.  What version of Return of the Living Dead had he been watching?  Needless to say, when he started describing a scene involving a certain Ms. Quigley, I resigned myself to the fact that we were going home with Time Bandits again.



The North West Video Centre always stocked up on the Charles Band movies though, which rarely ever troubled the censor beyond the 15 certificate.  So while Return of the Living Dead was still off-limits to me for a few years, Band movies became my gateway drug into the horror movies that existed beyond the safety net of late night TV.  Two of my absolute favourite Band movies from the days of the North West Video Centre were Ghoulies 2 and Terrorvision. I’m sure we rented out those two so many times that this alone kept the North West Video Centre afloat for many years. 

Now in my mind, and I accept my mind only, Terrorvision is forever synonymous with the 5th of November, Guy Fawkes/Bonfire night.  Have you ever tried to explain Guy Fawkes night to people from cultures that don’t celebrate it, without making us seem like a nation of macabre oddballs.  

Well, every year we celebrate the life of a failed terrorist by sending children out on the streets with a dummy of the man’s corpse to beg for money by saying “penny for the guy”.  As well as attending fireworks displays and public bonfires that usually end with an effigy of Guy Fawkes being burned to death...all of which has caused more people to die, be burnt or maimed than Guy Fawkes could have ever had hoped to achieve had he actually been successful in blowing up the House of Lords.

Still, I always used to enjoy Guy Fawkes night allot.  That was until one year in school when they showed what I guess you’d call a public information or classroom scare film about bonfires and warning of the dangers of the 5th of November.  Now, I know you hear about people who grew up in the 1970s and 1980s being traumatised by public information films about children being electrocuted, nuclear war or the spirit of dark and lonely water, but honesty all that must have passed me by, apart from this one scare film about bonfire night.  Maybe memory is exaggerating its content to me, but at the time this PIF felt to my young eyes as extreme as a Faces of Death film.  There were scenes of hands being burnt by sparklers, fireworks going off in children’s faces....a real horror show...I swear this film also showed a photo of a real life, badly burnt corpse too, and because they showed this particular film year in, year out at school, I’d always try and memorise whereabouts this shot appeared in the film, so I could look away at the precise moment...sadly without much success.

Needless to say, after that film I never wanted anything to do with bonfire night ever again.  My parents would ask if I wanted to go to a fireworks display or a bonfire this year...and I’d be like “no, no, no...can’t we stay in and rent a video instead”.  So, on a yearly basis we would rent out a video on the 5th of November, and Terrorvision gradually became the coward’s way to celebrate bonfire night.  



I absolutely adored Terrorvision as a kid, and even today it is a film I still have tremendous affection for.  I suppose Terrorvision is the closest horror cinema has ever come to a National Lampoon’s Vacation film, it does tap into the same dysfunctional all-American family unit.  There is the hopeless klutz father, the super hot mum, and their two kids who are considerably more smarter than the parents.  The dad and mum, Stanley and Raquel Putterman are played by Gerrit Graham and Mary Woronov, who of course have a truckload of charisma, comedy chops and cult film appearances between them, and more than fit the bill as the B-level Chevy Chase and Beverly D’ Angelo.  When Stanley puts up a massive satellite TV dish in the back garden, the Putterman household is blessed with hundreds of TV channels, broadcasting wresting, B-movies and softcore porn at all hours of the day.  Unfortunately, the dish also beams an excitable dog-like space monster into the household that has a habit of eating people.   I’m sure if you watch Terrorvision these days, it looks more than a little dated in terms of the tech, but at a time when we only had four TV channels and just this tiny little video shop down the road, the world of the Putterman’s looked like Nirvana.  None of the characters seemed to work, the kids were allowed to stay up all night watching horror movies, and because they were Americans they could run around with machine guns and hand grenades too.  This all sounded great with a capital G to me...and who wouldn’t want Gerrit Graham and Mary Woronov as their parents?  Can you imagine if those two had actually had kids, they could have bred a whole new master race of coolness.  One aspect of Terrorvision’s appeal that I think may have been taken for granted by an American audience, but had a greater impact outside of the States was its depiction of horror host culture.  A long standing tradition in America, but something that was largely unheard of in the UK, and something we only really learned about through movies like this, Elvira, Mistress of the Dark and to a lesser extent the dreadfully unfunny Norman Thaddeus Vane film Midnight.  Terrorvision’s Elvira like horror hostess being Medusa, who wears a tacky, fake bunch of snakes on her head, and introduces horror movies in linking segments that place particular emphasis on Medusa’s ample bosom.  

From what I understand Terrorvision wasn’t really a big success in its day, despite me continually renting it out from the North West Video Centre, which is sad but looking at it with a more critical eye- you can kinda see why it initially fell between the cracks, and needed a bit of time to find an audience and grow into a cult movie.  At first appearance Terrorvision looks like a kids movie, and it is an out and out comedy, which I think may have kept the hardcore horror crowd away, but it doesn’t quite fit the mould of being your typical 1980s family film either.  There being a level of adult themed humour that would, and trust me did, go over the head of a younger audience.  In the long term though, I think this aspect to the film is to Terrorvision’s benefit, because it is the kind of film you can enjoy as a simple monster movie as a kid, and then revisit as an adult and discover this whole extra layer of humour.  Most of which evolves around the fact that the Putterman parents are swingers, and have a subplot where they invite another swinger couple into their home. Only for it all to go awry when they discover that the male half of the other swinger couple, Spirio, is bi-sexual and wants to get up to some gay fella business with Stanley.  Of course, watching Terrorvision as a kid, none of this registered in my innocent eyes.  I just thought the Puttermans were merely a very friendly couple who wanted to meet new people, and couldn’t understand why Stanley took against Spirio when he discovered Spirio was “into Greek”.  It’s only when you rewatch the film as an adult that the penny drops, and you realise...ah, that’s what being into Greek means. 

Up until the end of the 1980s, the North West Video Centre was the only go to place in my area when it came to VHS rentals, but eventually a couple of chain stores began muscling in on the action.  I think the first one to appear was Jack Beanstalk video, which was a much bigger and professional affair than the North West video centre.  Initially Jack Beanstalk video actually had one of the pillars in the video shop decked out to look like a beanstalk and a cuddly toy version of Jack climbing up it. I don’t know whose idea it was to name a video store chain after a fairy tale –strange bedfellows indeed- but credit where it’s due, I still remember it all these years on.  Whereas with the North West Video Centre everything felt very random, Jack Beanstalk was completely organised into genres, with newer and older releases segregated.  Jack Beanstalk was also the only chain I ever encountered to have its own ‘erotica’ section which was located in a discrete far corner of the shop, next to the horror section.  This corner also had a pillar in the centre of it that you had to walk around to see the erotica section, which kept it out of view of your casual customer.  In all honesty, I didn’t pay a great deal of attention to the erotica section, but would occasionally get a sideways glance of it from the horror section.  From memory, I don’t think there was much to write home about there.  A couple of the Porkys films maybe, a few likeminded American sex comedies, possibly The Stud and Emmanuelle.  The only one I can clearly remember is a film called ‘The Sex O’Clock News’.  I will admit to caving into curiosity and watching that one on Youtube recently- and yeah- I clearly didn’t miss much by not exploring the erotica section. 



former site of Jack Beanstalk Video

Jack Beanstalk video was also one of the few chains I knew that also sold videos, not ex-rental tapes, but brand new £9.99 priced sell through releases, which didn’t appear to be a very popular sideline.  Believe it or not, it was still very uncommon for people to want to own tapes back then.  One tape that they had for sale was ‘Staying Alive’ and I swear from the day Jack Beanstalk opened till the day it closed, they couldn’t give that tape away.  I remember picking it up once, spurred on by the title Staying Alive and thinking it was a horror film, but then realising it was just about a guy trying to make it as a dancer.  Kiss Meets the Phantom of the Park was another video they had for sale, and I guess the Kiss army didn’t extend to Walkden because you could blow the dust off that thing.  Return of the Living Dead 2 was another sell through title they had for sale, and yeah the public told Jack Beanstalk were they could stick that one as well. 

The videos I did buy from Jack Beanstalk were the Vipco ones.  This being the second coming of Vipco on VHS in the early 1990s, which allowed younger viewers a diluted idea of what was around during the pre-cert era ...so I would have picked up The Groove Tube, The Deadly Spawn and The Bogey Man from there.  I remember though that they only stocked one Vipco release at a time, when one Vipco tape sold they’d order the next one...and so on and so forth.  Meaning that you’d have to pretty much buy everything Vipco put out, in order to get your hands on their next release.  



Vipco's Greatest Hits

The rise of Jack Beanstalk also coincided with the Ninja phenomenon of the late 1980s, and their shelves were soon groaning with all manner of Ninja movies.  I tended to gravitate towards the Godfrey Ho type movies like Ninja Terminator, rather than American made fare like Enter the Ninja and the American Ninja series.  The Ho stuff always seemed a bit more off the wall and wacky then their American cousins, and silly as it sounds because they were made in Hong Kong and had predominately Asian casts these seemed more ‘authentic’ Kung-Fu movies in my eyes.  The irony is that the Ho films were of course re-jigged and re-edited versions of HK movies with new footage starring Westerners in an attempt to make them more palatable to round eyed tastes.  There were so many of those movies about then...Ninja Terminator, Golden Ninja Warrior, Ninja the Protector, Ninja Holocaust, Ninja Thunderbolt, Ninja Commandments...over the years they’ve all blurred together in my mind, a mass of multi-coloured Ninjas, guys with too much eye shadow and Garfield phones.  In their humourless, killjoy manner the BBFC would often prune these films of the sight of ninja stars and nunchucks, even though toy shops were doing a brisk trade in plastic replicas of such weaponry, aimed at ninja loving kids like myself.

Jack Beanstalk’s horror section was a wee affair, but nevertheless I did make a couple of interesting discoveries there. It was there I first encountered the films of Pete Walker...House of the Long Shadows and Schizo being the only two of his films that were still in circulation back then.  Not the greatest introduction to his films if I’m being honest, I have to admit I’ve never been big on House of the Long Shadows, I know some have affection for it on account of it being the only time its four horror icon actors (Vincent Price, Christopher Lee, Peter Cushing, John Carradine) were onscreen together, but they’ve all been in much better films separately.  Schizo, I suppose gives you a far greater idea of what Pete Walker films were all about, but even so the general consensus is that it isn’t one of the better ones, especially in that Warner Home Video release which had so, so much cut out.  I finally got to see my first Friday the 13th film in Jack Beanstalk video too.  Friday the 13th Part 8: Jason Takes Manhattan, which I know isn’t one of the better ones, but because it was the first one I saw, and the first time I was considered old enough to finally see Jason in action, I probably have more affection for it than it deserves.

Trying to do the maths, I’d estimate I’d be around 13 at the time, and begrudgingly in a couple of instances I have to admit that maybe I was a little too young to be watching this stuff.  ‘The Video Dead’ is burnt into my brain for that reason, boy...was that a gory movie for 1987.  Censorship wise that one got away with allot for the period, an iron is stuck into someone’s head, a zombie is cut in half with a chainsaw, and in one scene characters cannibalise each other.  Briefly, it centres around a bunch of zombies who haunt a TV set, and are initially seen in a Night of the Living Dead type b/w horror film playing on the TV, before emerging from the TV to kill the people who are watching it.  Technically, I suppose the film should be called The Television Dead, since they emerge from a TV set rather than a Video recorder, but since when did B-Movies let a thing like plot accuracy get in the way of a brilliant title?  The only way to stop the Video Dead from coming out of the TV is to tape a mirror to the TV set....and this is so embarrassing I can’t believe I’m publically admitting to it, but such did this film get under my skin that after watching it I seriously asked my parents if we could tape a mirror to the TV set that night.  Just in case this film had any basis in reality.  At which point they seriously began to consider whether I should be allowed to watch horror films at all.




Jack Beanstalk wasn’t the only video chain to open up shop in the area.  We also got a Ritz video, I’m struggling to remember which came first Jack Beanstalk or Ritz.  It seemed like they both sprung up roughly around the same time.  Ritz had this red lettering on yellow background logo, and I remember yellow and red being the predominate colour scheme of the store itself.  Ritz was the only store I ever encountered that was a two story affair, new releases on the first floor, and older releases on the second floor.  In terms of atmosphere, Ritz had by far the greatest horror section, you had to go up this long, dark staircase to get to the horror section on the 2nd floor.  Once you got there you were met by four walls of VHS, no windows, and nothing but dead silence, you could hear a pin drop in there. A whole wall was dedicated to shoulder to shoulder horror titles.  Ones that I remember are Mutant, Mutant 2, Scared to Death, CHUD, Night of the Living Dead, The Devil Within Her and Night of the Alien.  The rest are a bit of a blur but I’m fairly certain An American Werewolf in London and a couple of the Friday the 13th and Prom Night sequels were there as well.  Mutant, I saw again recently and while there are a couple of moments that I vividly recalled from the VHS days, like zombie children attacking the heroine in a toilet cubicle, I was a little taken aback by how slow paced it was.  Frankly, I’m amazed that younger me made it through it.  Mutant 2 was a bit of a con-job, in that it was an unrelated foreign film that the distributor- Entertainment in Video- had re-titled.  Mutant 1 having presumably done enough business on UK video to warrant a sequel, even if the distributor had to invent one.   Devil Within Her was an Apex video tape, a budget price label, whose releases you rarely saw on the rental shelves, so that in itself was an abnormality.  Night of the Living Dead was that awful colourised version that Palace Video put out in the late 1980s.  People tend to forget that the colourised abomination was the only way to see the film in the UK for many years.  There had been a pre-cert VHS of the b/w version but that had largely disappeared from view by this time, it wouldn’t be until 1995 that Tartan video re-issued the b/w version on tape. Until then you were stuck with turning the colour down on your TV set to see the film as Romero intended.  Scared to Death is another film that like Mutant, looks a little slow paced today, but all in all I’d say lived up to the expectations of its VHS sleeve, and stills of its Alien-like creature the Syngenor, that I’d seen in Starlog magazine.




Night of the Alien was another con job re-titling of a film the rest of the world seems to have gotten as Future-Kill, but in the UK it was Night of the Alien, complete with a piece of HR Giger artwork that had been commissioned for the Future-Kill poster.  Based on that and the UK release title, you’d imagine this to be the type of movie that Scared to Death was, an Alien imitation set on earth due to its lower budget.  In reality, it begins like a mixture of Scorsese’s After Hours and a frat comedy, with a bunch of nerds being dared into spending a night in the rough area of town, which is lorded over by a disfigured bad guy called Splatter (Texas Chainsaw Massacre icon Ed Neal), who wears a metallic mask and kills people with a spiked glove.  So technically, yes this is a film about people spending a night in a territory that is ‘alien’ to them, but c’mon no one renting a film called Night of the Alien would have expected that to be what the title referred too. The predictable BBFC cuts didn’t help either.  

Looking back, I can’t emphasise enough how creepy it was up there in the horror section, and dangerous too.  No windows, no emergency exit, and just a staircase to downstairs as the only way out, pretty much a health and safety nightmare.  For the majority of the time you pretty much had the place to yourself as well, on the rare occasions there was anyone else up there, they tended to be older guys, loitering around.  On reflection I suppose I should be grateful that the only traumatic thing that happened to me up there was being eyeballed by the characters on the VHS covers of CHUD, Scared to Death and Night of the Alien.




formally The Ritz Video Shop, the stairway to the horror section visible to the right

The most amusing incident to play out at the Ritz video shop, actually took place on the first floor.  My grandparents, who were a bit of a soft touch when it came to me, were talked into renting out Predator on my behalf.  So, we were driving back to my grandparents to watch it, and half way home I noticed that the tape in the generic, see through Ritz video box, bore a 15 certificate.  Upon opening it, I discovered that the tape the cashier had given us was in fact Children of a Lesser God. The Oscar nominated film about a deaf woman falling in love, which of course is very easy to mistake for Predator, the plots of those two films being practically interchangeable!! So, we turned the car around and rushed back to the shop.  Fortunately they still had the correct tape, thus preventing any poor sod who actually wanted to see Children of a Lesser God from going home with Predator instead.  Ever since then though, those two films have always been intertwined in my mind...Children of a Lesser Predator.

Ritz eventually moved to the other side of Walkden Shopping Centre, without much change to its set up.  Two floors, new releases on the first floor, older stuff upstairs, lengthy staircase to the second floor, which tended to keep the regular customers confided to the first floor.  Although my eyes would always go towards the horror section, for some reason when it comes to Ritz mark two, I tend to remember the videos in the other sections the more.  The ‘action’ section had Blazing Magnum, the Italian film with Stuart Whitman, Special Effects by Larry Cohen, and Crimewave by Sam Raimi. I’m pretty sure the comedy section had one of the Confessions films...probably Pop Performer, and Rosie Dixon: Night Nurse. So the British sex comedy films were still around back then, the fact that they weren’t allowed to play on TV, presumably giving them a shelf life in the VHS shops that the Hammer and Amicus films of a similar vintage didn’t have.  One other thing I remember about the second incarnation of Ritz is that the top of the staircase that took you to the second floor had a poster for Troll 2, which remained there for the longest time, and yeah, Troll 2 was quite the jaw dropper going into it expecting a direct sequel to Troll.  This of course being years before the ‘so bad its good’ cult sprung up around Troll 2, these days I don’t think you can ever fully recapture the experience of what it’s like to go into Troll 2 blind.  I actually had a bad experience at the 2nd Ritz once. Me and my mother were on the first floor minding our own business, and I was looking over the VHS box of Class of 1999.  I don’t even think we were considering renting it, but this old crone behind the counter saw me with that video and started laying into us, claiming “I don’t think it would be appropriate to rent that out for him, that is an extremely violent film, they don’t put 18 certificates on these things for nothing”.  Really reading the riot act to us.  I still actually have Class of 1999 on video, despite the fact that I don’t really like the film all that much, nor do I even have a machine to play it on, but I like keeping it around.  Call it my symbolic victory over all the censorious killjoys of the VHS era.




As far as I remember the North West Video Centre, Ritz and Jack Beanstalk video all co-existed together.  Obviously they were in competition with each other, but I don’t remember any of them putting the other out of business.  Then came the big one, Blockbuster Video and when they dropped one of those on Walkden, things changed considerably.  I’ve never really understood the nostalgic love for Blockbuster video.  Out of all the rental stores it was the one that felt the most corporate and impersonal...plus we were hearing all these horror stories from the States about how they were killing off all of the smaller video chains over there.  It didn’t stop us from going however, and it is true that Blockbuster did kill off the competition. The North West Video Centre, Ritz and Jack Beanstalk all disappeared off the map pretty soon after.  Blockbuster’s edge over the competition was that they had multiple copies of the same movie, thereby removing the anxiety and disappointment of going to the video shop and not getting the film you wanted.  I remember Jack Beanstalk only had one copy of Robocop 2, and you’d go there and find it had been rented out, go back the next day and find it hadn’t been returned on time...etc, etc.  So in those smaller stores it could be quite the wild goose chase to get hold of new movies.

By this time my taste in movies had tended to drift outside of the mainstream anyway, and in fairness if you were prepared to spend some time exploring their soulless shelves, Blockbuster wasn’t all mainstream dross.  Among the older stuff that was still on Blockbuster’s shelves was the Deathstalker series, Bruce Lee films, Truck Turner with Isaac Hayes, Black Mama, White Mama, Twilight People, they also had that rare, English dubbed release of A Better Tomorrow that RCA/Columbia put out a good few years before John Woo became a cult figure.  





I’ve mentioned this in depth before but my local Blockbuster also had this strange, regional American film called The Hunted (aka Johnny Vik), which Intervision video had ridiculously tried to pass off as a Rambo/First Blood type movie. It was very rare to see a pre-cert era tape still on the rental shelves by then, so that alone attracted me to that one.  The irony is that these type of tapes were the first to end up in Blockbuster’s ‘for sale’ bin, in order to make way for multiple copies of Titanic, Gladiator and Braveheart, and yet all these years on those older tapes are the only ones to have any value, whereas all those mass produced, mainstream titles are now the absolute dead wood of the VHS era. 

Now, I’m no expert or historian when it comes to physical media, I was just someone in the field, but from my perspective what seemed to be the death knell for Blockbuster was the transition from VHS to DVD.  The DVD format felt like it didn’t lend itself well to the overnight rental model.  Whereas with VHS all that tended to be on the tape was the film itself and a few trailers, DVDs suddenly had extra scenes, audio commentaries, interviews etc etc, something you couldn’t just consume overnight and return the next day.  During the VHS era there also seemed to be a lengthy gap between a video being available for rental and a video being able to buy.  Whereas that gap didn’t seem to exist during the DVD period- and most people tended to go with the option of buying a DVD rather than renting it.  From what I remember when Blockbuster made the switch from VHS to DVD, we only ever rented the one DVD from them, an Arnold Schwarzenegger movie called- oh so appropriately- End of Days.  That indeed, was the end of days for me as far as movie rentals go.  The video rental shops, the North West Video Centre, Jack Beanstalk, Ritz had all gone by then, and Blockbuster folded in the UK a few years later. Time moved on.



the unmarked grave of Blockbuster Video

As I was saying to an internet buddy recently, I thought that when we end up on the very, very wrong side of thirty, we are meant to be all jealous and bitter about the technology and freedoms that are enjoyed by young people which weren’t around in our day, but I’m still waiting for those kind of feelings to start kicking in.  If anything, I actually feel sorry for people growing up in these days of COVID-19 and all the other unrest and upheaval in the world, and take pride in the fact that I grew up in the video era. It’s true, not everything was great back then- this isn’t some rose tinted look back at the VHS era- the films were often cut to shreds, many key horror films were banned outright, we were frequently duped by re-titled movies that didn’t live up to expectations, tapes got worn out, beaten up and ended up looking like shit, but I can say I grew up in a era that people who were there look back on fondly, and that people who weren’t now view with fascination and wonder. A claim that tragically is going to be denied to anyone growing up these days.  That’s the problem with golden ages though, you never truly realise you’re living through one until it is all over. 

Don’t forget to tape a mirror to your TV set tonight.     

 


                     

Monday, 29 March 2021

Demonsoul (1995)

 


A fairly rare example of a British Shot-On-Video horror film from the 1990s (although it did bypass the UK market).  Demonsoul was a film I remember being mentioned in passing in a few of the horror mags of the time and I think FAB press’ Ten Years of Terror book (a fairly derogatory mention, if I recall correctly) but since its VHS release was confided to the States, Demonsoul quickly fell off the radar. The film’s profile only being raised slightly by its recent reappearance on a cheapo US DVD release, that partnered it with three other SOV titles. 

Erica Steele (Kerry Norton) is plagued by nightmares about black masses, vampirism and the mysterious Selena (Eileen Daly). “I wake up and I can never get back to sleep” Erica tells her shrink “then I turn up to work tied and restless, and piss everyone off”.  Visits to pervy hypnotherapist Dr Bucher (Daniel Jordan), who uses hypnosis as an excuse to grope female patients, don't help and soon Erica is seeing vampire Selena on the street and having visions of Selena fucking her boyfriend Alex. During one of his touchy feely sessions Bucher discovers that Erica is in fact being controlled by Dana.  No, not the Irish Eurovision song contest winner, rather Selena's long dead lesbian vampire lover of the same name. Bucher attempts to enter into a pact with Dana, even offering his secretary to her as a blood sacrifice. Only for it all to backfire on Bucher when Selena and her hooded followers kidnap him and Alex leading to some BDSM and spirited blood drinking by leather clad vampires. 

Demonsoul does have Eileen Daly's sapphic vampire shenanigans going for it, a shtick later to find a better known home in Razor Blade Smile (1998) a few years later. Alas, the film does tend to fall asleep when she isn't onscreen, leaving you with some flat supporting actors and echoey sound recording to test your patience. Norton and Jordan are fine, and contrary to the idea that actors who appear in SOV productions are on a hiding to nothing, seem to have enjoyed lengthy and successful careers, but when the one-movie-and-they’re-done cast members take to the screen, Demonsoul does get brought back down to a home movie level.  Along the way though there is gore, nudity, kinkiness and a few truly bizarre moments to wake you up like Alex being mobbed by cult members in a park, which apropos of nothing is intercut with shots of a cute l'ttle squirrel going about its business….awwww.  Allen Bryce, the editor of The Dark Side magazine also shows up as the head of a lunatic asylum towards the end.

Demonsoul’s credits reveal it to be the work of several pioneers of the American SOV scene.  Co-producer Matt Devlen was the man behind The Abomination (1986), one of the more famous SOV horror films of the Eighties.  Another producer Jerry Feifer was the mastermind behind the long running ‘Witchcraft’ movie series, which managed to make it to sixteen entries.  Demonsoul has the feel of a test movie, to see if Feifer’s Witchcraft formula of horror, sex and no-frills production values could work in a UK setting.  A test it presumably passed since Feifer temporarily relocated the Witchcraft series to the UK for 1998’s Witchcraft X: Mistress of the Craft which retained this film’s director and brought back Eileen Daly in its cast.  Too cash strapped for any gothic horror trappings (we only anecdotally hear about Dana’s persecution and death in ye olden times) Demonsoul is resolutely contemporary and despite its American financing resolutely British too.  The opening credits are a runaround of the capital that manages to include just about every piece of London iconography that you can think of, the Tower of London, Big Ben, Tower Bridge, double-decker buses, black cabs, red phone boxes.  This isn’t just a glamourous travelogue made with American tourists in mind though, Demonsoul is happy to get its hands dirty location wise, with SOV production values making 1990s Britain look even more colour drained than usual.  Demonsoul’s London takes in shots of garbage ridden streets, the stiflingly middle class blandness of the office Erica works at, while a dirty, disused church plays host to the majority of the horror film incidents here.  Then there is Erica’s lodgings, with its dirty kitchen sink, Jean-Luc Godard poster and where characters pass the time playing Monopoly, all of which feels on the money in terms of young people living on the low down in 1990s London.  Seemingly the only concessions to its intended American video market is a reference to Erica “needing a vacation” and a last minute appearance by R.J Bell, a Canadian actor who lent a bit of transatlantic flavor to many British productions of the era. 



As well as giving the vampire myth a contemporary spin, Demonsoul zips it up in a PVC costume and firmly entrenches it in the era’s fetish scene.  A reoccurring theme in Demonsoul, and the heart of its fetishistic appeal lays in seeing obnoxious, domineering men having the tables unexpectedly turned on them.  Erica, firmly under the influence of Dana, struts her stuff around the backstreets of London, attracting the attention of a longhaired bloke who slaps her about and calls her a bitch, only for her to hit back with dirty talk “let me go, you peasant” before baring her fangs and going for his jugular.  A gimpy guy clad in leather underwear and a dog collar is regularly brought out for Selena to straddle and torture with a knife, before her leather clad underlings make a bloody mess of him. This man’s lack of connections to other films suggesting he was here for the party rather than the acting experience.  Bucher is built up as such a repugnant creep, who only got into hypnotherapy after being discredited as a medium, and uses it to con women out of money and sexually molest them while they are unconscious.  Naturally, given the film’s fem-dom inclinations it is Bucher who suffers the most, as he is rendered powerless when Erica/Dana gets the upper hand during one of the hypnotherapy sessions, stripping off, becoming the dominate one sexually, then tearing off his shirt and biting his chest.  The ultimate frightmare of a predatory guy who likes ‘em passive and passed out.  Later on he is whisked off to by whipped by Selena, who adds insult to injury by tearing into his back with her fingernails “You’re pathetic, you worthless piece of slime”.  Demonsoul showcases the dominatrix bitch persona that Eileen Daly would take on a roll for many years, from Redemption VHS covers to the aforementioned Razor Blade Smile, before reinventing herself as a kooky, Big Brother contestant (although surely anyone who appeared in three Richard Driscoll movies along the way must surely have a masochistic streak to them as well). 

The first time I saw Demonsoul I have to admit that I didn’t make it all the way through, the second time I managed to get through it but didn’t like it, the third time around and I have to admit to warming to it, and I daresay the film might make a convert of me yet.  SOV productions do tend to be the unwashed urchins of the horror movie world though, in that it does take a bit of persistence, not to mention perseverance, in order to see any good in them.  The 1990s was a punishing time to be a British horror film fan, trust one who lived through it and spent a little too much time staring into that abyss.  You would hold out hope that the next film to come along would be a return to former glories, only to be confronted with bores like Beyond Bedlam, Tale of a Vampire, merely adequate schlock like Breeders and Proteus, or retarded garbage like Revenge of Billy the Kid and Funnyman.  Believe me, it is no coincidence that the same decade saw many adopt a backwards gazing stance and choose to rediscover later day Hammer and Amicus, plus the films of Pete Walker, Jose Larraz and Norman J Warren, rather than champion the present.  However Demonsoul does suggest that there was the odd glimmer of hope which we may have overlooked whilst we hurried back towards the comforting bosom of the 1970s.  So it’s sad to discover that the film's director Elisar Cabrera (billed here as Elisar C Kennedy) died recently at the young age of 49.